• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer
Burma Campaign UK

Burma Campaign UK

  • Campaign News
  • Media
    • News
    • Reports
    • Burma Briefing
    • Blog
  • Take Action
    • Campaign Actions
    • Investment and Trade in Burma
    • Dirty List
    • Free All Political Prisoners
    • Persecution of the Rohingya
    • Arms Embargo
    • Aid to Burma
  • Support us
    • Donate
    • T-shirt store
    • Fundraising for Burma
    • Leave a gift in your Will
    • Trade Union Affiliation
    • Sign up to our Action Network
  • About Burma
    • Introduction
    • Timeline of the Coup
    • Fake 2010 Elections
    • Cyclone Nargis
    • 2007 Uprising in Burma
    • Aung San Suu Kyi
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
  • Donate

UN Security Council Fails Again – UK, US and EU Must Coordinate Further Action

November 11, 2021 All News, British policy on Burma, Coup, Crimes Against Humanity, Targeted Sanctions, The United Nations and Burma, Trade and Investment

Burma Campaign UK today called on the UK, US and EU to urgently implement further economic sanctions and take other steps, following the failure of the UN Security Council to agree effective action or even refer to the situation in North-Western Burma in a statement yesterday. The statement is available here.

Burma Campaign UK and more than 500 other civil society organisations have been calling for a meeting of the UN Security Council to address what looks like an impending military offensive in North-Western Burma, which has echoes of the situation ahead of the military offensive against the Rohingya in 2017.

The UN Security Council met on Monday, and finally agreed a statement on Wednesday, but it contained no specific reference to the situation in North-Western Burma.

“If the UN Security Council was fulfilling its mandate, it would already have imposed an arms embargo, referred the situation to the International Criminal Court, imposed targeted economic sanctions and sanctioned the supply of aviation fuel,” said Anna Roberts, Executive Director at Burma Campaign UK. “What was needed was a clear warning to the military that a new offensive in North-Western Burma would not be tolerated. What we got what was a statement that didn’t even directly refer to the situation.”

The statement by the UN Security Council once again highlights the disparity between what could be considered a diplomatic success, and the situation on the ground. British diplomats worked hard to secure the meeting and highlight the dangers of the situation in North-Western Burma. Given the strong resistance to UN Security Council intervention on Burma by Russia and China, with Russia even boycotting one recent meeting, securing a Security Council statement agreed to by Russia and China is a significant diplomatic success. However, none of the civil society organisations Burma Campaign UK has spoken with so far believe this will have any impact. This was also reflected in a joint statement responding to the UN Security Council Statement, which included Chin Human Rights Organisation, available here.

Burma Campaign UK has previously written about this dilemma in a blog: The Importance and Futility of UN Security Council Statements on Burma, available here.

Diplomats will understandably be disappointed that something they worked hard for, and which in their world is a diplomatic success, is being criticised by so many civil society and human rights organisations.

The assumption of diplomats is that a consensus statement which includes traditional allies of the military such as China and Russia will have an impact on the military. Diplomats from UN Security Council members will also feel that the language is stronger than previous statements. However, civil society organisations that Burma Campaign UK spoke with would have preferred a stronger statement by like-minded countries than a weak UN Security Council Statement. They also wanted a statement that actually reflected the situation on the ground, not toning down the seriousness of what is going on.

With the UN Security Council having failed to deliver the kind of message which could have acted as a deterrent to a new military offensive, those countries which wanted stronger action that was blocked by Russia and China, now have an obligation to coordinate further urgent action. This should include accelerating plans for new rounds of targeted economic sanctions, more public and proactive work in persuading more countries to impose arms embargoes, and sanctioning aviation fuel. The majority of the quarter of a million people displaced since the coup are the result of bombing  by jets, helicopters and drones and the threat of further bombing is preventing people from returning home.

“One of the single most effective things the US and EU can do now is to stop gas revenues going to the military,” said Anna Roberts. “Gas revenue sanctions will send a strong message to the military at the same time as having a significant financial impact and weakening their ability to keep attacking civilian populations.”

Note to editor:

20th October statement by Burma Campaign UK calling for emergency UN Security Council meeting.

Recent news stories

Previous Post:Military steps up attacks against Christians in hill regions of Myanmar – Catholic Herald
Next Post:Calls mount for ‘deluded’ UK accounting bodies to quit conference – Myanmar Now

Sidebar

You may also like

  1. UN Security Council Burma Resolution Will Have No Practical Impact
  2. UK is Raising North-Western Burma Crisis with UN Security Council Members
  3. Security Council Statement Welcome – Concrete Action Must Be Next Step
  4. Security Council Burma Statement is Progress, But Not Enough

Join our action network

Subscribe

Who we are

Burma Campaign UK works for Human Rights, Democracy and Development in Burma

Join our Action Network

Subscribe

Find out more

  • Campaign News
  • About Burma
  • About Us
  • Resources

Follow us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Materials on this website are provided under a Creative Commons License | Privacy and Cookies Policy

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. Click Read More for information on cookies and our privacy policy. Accept or Block non-essential cookies
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT