• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer
Burma Campaign UK

Burma Campaign UK

  • Campaign News
  • Media
    • News
    • Reports
    • Burma Briefing
    • Blog
  • Take Action
    • Campaign Actions
    • Investment and Trade in Burma
    • Dirty List
    • Free All Political Prisoners
    • Persecution of the Rohingya
    • Arms Embargo
    • Aid to Burma
  • Support us
    • Donate
    • T-shirt store
    • Fundraising for Burma
    • Leave a gift in your Will
    • Trade Union Affiliation
    • Sign up to our Action Network
  • About Burma
    • Introduction
    • Timeline of the Coup
    • Fake 2010 Elections
    • Cyclone Nargis
    • 2007 Uprising in Burma
    • Aung San Suu Kyi
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
  • Donate

UK Government: ‘Tangible Progress’ Needed Before EU Eases Burma Sanctions

February 12, 2010 All News, News Stories, Targeted Sanctions

Media Release From Burma Campaign UK

The Burma Campaign UK today welcomed a statement by Foreign Office Minister Ivan Lewis MP that; “The UK will not support any easing of sanctions in the absence of tangible progress on the ground.”

On Thursday the European Parliament also called on EU governments not to relax sanctions until there is; ‘tangible progress on democratisation.’
The UK government statement came in a Parliamentary Written Answer in response to a question by Stephen Crabb MP, Co-Chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group For Democracy in Burma.

The European Union has a joint foreign policy on Burma, known as the Common Position on Burma. All 27 EU members jointly agree the policy, which is renewed each April. Discussions will start soon about renewing the Common Position.

The official EU policy is to increase pressure if there is no change in Burma, and relax pressure in response to positive change. This is the same policy as the USA, which has had a recent attempt to increase dialogue with Burma’s generals rebuffed.

“The Burma Campaign UK welcomes the British government’s sensible approach on EU sanctions,” said Zoya Phan, International Coordinator at Burma Campaign UK. “EU sanctions need to start being used proactively as leverage to extract concessions from Burma’s generals. To lift sanctions at a time when the regime continues with horrific human rights abuses and defies the United Nations would send the wrong signal to the Generals. They would see it as encouragement to continue their rule.”

Some EU governments, such as Germany, Austria and Italy, have favoured relaxing sanctions, as they put business interests in Asia ahead of human rights in Burma. In addition, European Commission staff publicly and privately undermine the official EU position on Burma.

The main EU sanctions include an arms embargo, visa ban, and ban on imports of gems, precious stones and timber. However, Germany has reportedly exported duel use technology (could be used for military purposes) to Burma, and the import ban has no enforcement mechanisms, and gems are openly exported to European countries.

“We appreciate that at the current time there is little hope that the EU will finally introduce the kind of financial sanctions we have been calling for, which would have a bigger impact on the generals,” said Zoya Phan, International Coordinator at Burma Campaign UK. “However, it would be nice if the EU would consider actually implementing and enforcing sanctions that they do have.”

For more information contact Zoya Phan on 020 7324 4710

Full Question And Answer From Hansard Parliamentary Record

10 Feb 2010 : Column 980W
Mr. Crabb: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will seek to secure EU targeted sanctions against the government of Burma until the human rights situation in Burma improves. [316581]

Mr. Ivan Lewis:
 The Government continue to believe that targeted EU sanctions against the military regime in Burma are an important means of maintaining pressure for political reform and respect for human rights. Sanctions introduced in 1996 have been strengthened over time, notably after the Saffron Revolution in 2007, and in August 2009 in response to the guilty verdict in Aung San Suu Kyi’s trial. They are now among the EU’s toughest autonomous measures against any country. The UK will not support any easing of sanctions in the absence of tangible progress on the ground.

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmhansrd/cm100210/text/100210w0003.htm

Recent news stories

Previous Post:European Parliament Rejects Burma Election – Calls For End To Systematic Displacement
Next Post:U Tin Oo Release Welcome, But Not A Sign of Change In Burma

Sidebar

You may also like

  1. EU – More Caution Needed on Burma Sanctions
  2. UK Government – No Review or Dilution of Burma Sanctions Yet
  3. Burma Regime Ignores EU Calls For Reform: Sanctions Must Remain
  4. EU Must Maintain Burma Sanctions

Join our action network

Subscribe

Who we are

Burma Campaign UK works for Human Rights, Democracy and Development in Burma

Join our Action Network

Subscribe

Find out more

  • Campaign News
  • About Burma
  • About Us
  • Resources

Follow us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Materials on this website are provided under a Creative Commons License | Privacy and Cookies Policy

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. Click Read More for information on cookies and our privacy policy. Accept or Block non-essential cookies
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT