• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer
Burma Campaign UK

Burma Campaign UK

  • Campaign News
  • Media
    • News
    • Reports
    • Burma Briefing
    • Blog
  • Take Action
    • Campaign Actions
    • Investment and Trade in Burma
    • Dirty List
    • Free All Political Prisoners
    • Persecution of the Rohingya
    • Arms Embargo
    • Aid to Burma
  • Support us
    • Donate
    • T-shirt store
    • Fundraising for Burma
    • Leave a gift in your Will
    • Trade Union Affiliation
    • Sign up to our Action Network
  • About Burma
    • Introduction
    • Timeline of the Coup
    • Fake 2010 Elections
    • Cyclone Nargis
    • 2007 Uprising in Burma
    • Aung San Suu Kyi
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
  • Donate

Sentencing of May Sabe Phyu and Maran Jaw Gun Highlights New Tactics of Intimidation

November 26, 2013 All News, Political Prisoners

Two Kachin peace activists, May Sabe Phyu and Maran Jaw Gun, were today fined 40,000 Kyat ($40, £24), for violating Section 18 of Burma’s Peaceful Assembly and Peaceful Procession Law, The case took place at San Chaung Township Court, Rangoon.

They had taken part in a peaceful protest in Rangoon on the International Day of Peace 2012, highlighting how the Burmese government broke a ceasefire in Kachin State, Burma, in 2011. Tens of thousands of people have been forced to flee attacks by the Burmese Army since they broke the ceasefire, and the United Nations have documented human rights abuses which could be classified as war crimes and crimes against humanity.

May Sabe Phyu and Maran Jaw Gun were made to attend 140 different court hearings over a period of almost two years. Burma Campaign UK attended one court hearing in Rangoon last year.

The case highlights three tactics being used by the government of Burma to try to suppress dissent and protest, but at the same time give the appearance of change and avoid international pressure.

Tactic one: New laws billed as reforms but which don’t meet international human rights standards
Burma’s Peaceful Assembly and Peaceful Procession Law was hailed as a key reform of President Thein Sein. Originally dubbed the right to protest law, it has in fact been used to arrest hundreds of activists for peacefully protesting, with well over 100 brought to court, and dozens convicted. The law gives government authorities power to ban any protest, and is even more severe than one of the SLORC era laws it replaced. Martial Law Order 2/88 stated the government could ban gatherings of five people or more. The new law brought in by Thein Sein applies to gatherings of two people or more.  In addition to this law being used to arrest and intimidate activists, almost every old repressive law remains in place, and other new laws brought in by Thein Sein also fail to meet international human rights standards.

Tactic two: multiple court hearings
The 140 court appearances are due in part to the inefficiencies of Burma’s justice system, and the fact that separate charges were made for each township the protest went through. However, the repeated refusal to consolidate cases into one, and the vast number of court hearings, some of which lasted only seconds, are part of a pattern of attempted intimidation designed to serve as a warning to others who might consider publicly protesting against government policies.

Tactic three: fines and shorter sentences
Aware of the negative international impact of long prison sentences given to peaceful activists, shorter sentences and fines and now being given to some activists, especially those cases where there is greater attention from diplomats and media.  In this way the government hopes to be able to continue intimidating activists while avoiding negative international attention. It could be argued that political activists receiving fines and shorter prison terms, rather than the sentences lasting several decades which used to be commonplace, is a positive step forward. The arrest and/or sentencing of any human rights activist for peacefully protesting against government policies is unacceptable, no matter what the sentence is. It is designed to intimidate and to suppress dissent. It is part of a pattern of continuing repression and should be unequivocally condemned as such. Failure to do so encourages the government to continue its repressive policies.

“May Sabe Phyu and Maran Jaw Gun spent almost two years in fear of being jailed, attending court cases more than once a week, and have now been fined and have a criminal conviction, all for organising a peaceful protest for peace,” said Mark Farmaner, Director of Burma Campaign UK. “This case highlights new laws and tactics being used by the government of Burma to suppress dissent while trying to avoid international pressure. Sadly, these tactics are working, with the British government and others still unwilling to take off their rose-tinted glasses when dealing with Thein Sein and his government.”

image
May Sabe Phyu and Maran Jaw Gun
image
Mark Farmaner, Khon Ja, Ningli Hkawn, Maran Ja Seng Hkawn, May Sabe Phyu, Ivan Lewis MP, Maran Jaw Gun and Anna Roberts outside one of the court hearings in Rangoon 2012.
 

 

Recent news stories

Previous Post:Political Prisoners Continue to Be Used as a PR Tool by Thein Sein
Next Post:1,000 Letters About Burma’s Political Prisoners Delivered To William Hague

Sidebar

You may also like

  1. Maran Gam and Zau La’s Case Must be Reviewed
  2. Free Sein Than – Repressive Protest Laws Must Go
  3. Thein Sein Must Release Nay Myo Zin and Win Cho
  4. January political prisoners of the month have been released

Join our action network

Subscribe

Who we are

Burma Campaign UK works for Human Rights, Democracy and Development in Burma

Join our Action Network

Subscribe

Find out more

  • Campaign News
  • About Burma
  • About Us
  • Resources

Follow us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Materials on this website are provided under a Creative Commons License | Privacy and Cookies Policy

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. Click Read More for information on cookies and our privacy policy. Accept or Block non-essential cookies
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT